THE OMAR AL-UBAYDLI HOMEPAGE
  • Home
  • About/CV
  • Research
  • Mainstream Media
  • Teaching

Article: "Juncker’s Delusion: Recommendations for Gulf Policymakers" ( أوهام «يونكر»: توصيات لمنفذي الرؤى الخليجية )

10/3/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
نُشر في صحيفة الحياة
English version below

تحوّلت المفاوضات بين الاتحاد الأوروبي والمملكة المتحدة حول خروجها من التكتل الإقليمي – «البريكسيت» – إلى صراع سياسي، لاسيما للطرف الأوروبي، الذي يسعى لإرسال رسالة لأعضائه عبر طريقة تعامله مع المملكة المتحدة: أية دولة تخرج من الاتحاد الأوروبي ستندم على ذلك. ولكن جون-كلود يونكر، رئيس المفوضية الأوروبية، أرسل لا شعورياً رسالة صارمة لدول الخليج العربي: اغتنموا فرصة تقليص دور الحكومة في الاقتصاد، وعززوا دور رواد الأعمال على حساب المؤسسات الحكومية، لكي لا تندموا على سلبيات التضخم البيروقراطي.ـ

المزيد
Negotiations between the European Union and the UK over its withdrawal from the regional bloc – dubbed “Brexit” – have transformed into a political duel, especially on the European side, which is trying to send a message to its members via its treatment of the UK: any country that leaves the EU will regret it. However, Jean-Claude Juncker, the president of the European Commission (EC), inadvertently sent a sobering message to the Arabian Gulf states: seize the opportunity to roll back the government’s role in the economy, and strengthen the role of entrepreneurs at the expense of government organizations, to avoid regrets over the costs of bureaucratic expansion.
Naturally, Jucker didn’t literally say that, and he would surely refuse such an interpretation of his words; what did he actually say, and what does it have to do with the Gulf countries’ economic visions? To correctly understand his speech, we must first understand the history of the EU, and the nature of the UK-EU feud.

The repugnant wars fought between European states created a desire for a new political order, with the aim of avoiding future, intra-European conflict. The EU was launched on this basis, initially as the European Coal and Steel Community in 1952, which then transformed into a free trade area, a customs union, a single market, and a monetary union in 1999.

Managing the European economic integration project required the establishment of an executive bureaucracy—the EC—and endowing the organization with significant powers, reflected in a sizeable budget (over 100 billion euros), a large workforce (33,000 employees), and the capacity to force member countries to adhere to European laws, backed by the ability to impose fines upon those failing to comply.

The EC succeeded in its most important assignment, which is the avoidance of an intra-European war. Today, no European citizen thinks of armed conflict with any other European, regardless of the cultural differences that exist.

However, this success came with a significant, unintended cost: the creation of a “bureaucratic beast” that cannot be contained, growing day upon day, with one goal: increasing its powers, and the resources under its control. The EC is afflicted with the same “inflation disease” that all bureaucratic organizations unencumbered by market pressure suffer from: the impossibility of diagnosing any underperformance on its part as being the result of its size, power, or resources; and the persistent belief that solving any problem starts with giving it more powers and resources.

Ask yourself this: can you recall any minister claiming that their ministry needs to decrease its resources to improve its performance? Or surrendering some of its powers in an attempt to perform its mission for effectively? In contrast, in the private sector, especially in highly competitive sectors, we regularly see firms concluding that they have overexpanded, and accordingly planning to scale back the volume of resources under their control, and their powers in general, as a way of improving their performance.

Excessive expansion on the EC’s powers is one of the key reasons for the UK’s decision to exit the EU, as the EC imposes laws and regulations that damage the UK economy, basically as a way of cementing its influence. Confirmation of its affliction with the “inflation disease” was recently provided by Juncker’s reaction to the Brexit crisis, in his last speech to the EU, wherein he launched his new vision: increasing the powers of the central EU institutions at the expense of the member governments, and plans for fiscal and political union.

Put short, bureaucrats have—as usual—concluded that, in spite of the clear role that bureaucratic inflation has played in the prevailing crisis, the solution is more bureaucratic inflation! Is there any scenario that would compel Juncker to recommend a diminution in his powers? I sincerely doubt it…

What does this have to do with the Gulf countries?

The link is that Gulf governmental organizations suffer from the same flaw: they have become excessively large, employing people who do not enhance productivity. Instead, they create pointless bureaucratic procedures that stifle the private sector, similar to the EC. The Gulf visions indicate that the leaders are aware of this phenomenon, as they all seek to diminish the government’s role in the economy, and to eliminate the damaging red tape that has accumulated over the past 50 years.

Naturally, these organizations will resist a policy of economic liberalization designed to curtail their powers. Their opposition could make leaders hesitate, and fatigue among reformers may even bring about a reversal of the policies.

However policymakers must make use of Juncker’s example as a sign of how bureaucratic organizations think, thereby assisting them in building an accurate and objective view of the optimal structure of the Gulf economies. In particular, Juncker’s statements confirm the need to employ independent sources for determining the powers and resources that should be given to government organizations, as well as the need to avoid relying exclusively on what those organizations themselves recommend. In virtually all cases, the head of any governmental organizations will assert to the country’s leaders that improving citizens’ standard of living starts with giving their organization more powers and resources, so that they can put their projects into action.

Yet the time has come to permanently empower the private sector, as it—and not bureaucrats—has the ability to solve the challenges faced by the Gulf countries.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Omar Al-Ubaydli

    This is where you can find all my articles, as well as some of my interviews and media mentions

    Archives

    June 2020
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    September 2015
    July 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    December 2014
    July 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    September 2013
    December 2011
    October 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011

    Categories

    All
    AGSIW
    Akhbar AlKhaleej
    Akransas Democrat Gazette
    Al Arabiya
    Al Hayat
    Al-Hayat
    AlHurra
    AlWatan
    Article
    Articles
    Axios
    Bahrain TV
    Bloomberg
    Capitol Hill Show
    Daily Caller
    Economic Development
    Economic Diversification
    Entrepreneurship
    Environment
    EU
    Experiment
    Financial Post
    Forbes
    Forbes Opinion
    Fox Business
    Game Theory
    GCC
    Government Policy
    Gulf Daily News
    IISS
    Ikhbariya
    InsideSources
    Investor's Business Daily
    Iran
    LSE Middle East Center Blog
    Marginal Revolution
    Marketplace
    MarketWatch
    MEPC
    Methodology
    Migration
    Newsweek ME
    Oil
    OPEC
    Philadelphia Inquirer
    Productivity
    Quartz
    Quotation
    Radio Interview
    R&D
    RegBlog
    Regulation
    RUSI Newsbrief
    Russia
    San Antonio Express
    Saudi Arabia
    Seminar
    Single Market
    Strade
    Subsidies
    The Hill
    The National
    Trade
    TRT World
    Tyler Morning Telegraph
    UAE
    Unemployment
    US News
    Video
    أخبار الخليج
    إذاعة البحرين
    الاتحاد الأوروبي
    الاتحاد الأوروبي
    الإنتاجية
    البحث العلمي
    البحرين
    البحرين
    التجارة
    التعليم
    التنمية الاقتصادية
    التنمية الاقتصادية
    التنويع الاقتصادي
    الحياة
    الحياة
    السعودية
    السوق المشتركة
    السياسة الحكومية
    السياسة الحكومية
    الصيرفة الإسلامية
    الضوابط
    الضوابط
    المعهد الدولي للدراسات الإستراتيجية
    النفط
    النفط
    الهجرة
    الهند
    الوسط
    الوطن
    إيران
    تلفزيون البحرين
    تلفزيون البحرين
    جمعية الريادة الشبابية
    روسيا
    مجلس التعاون
    مقابلة
    مقال
    مقال
    نظرية الألعاب
    نيوزويك الشرق الأوسط

    RSS Feed

Omar Al-Ubaydli
Bahrain Center for Strategic, International and Energy Studies
PO Box 496, Manama
Kingdom of Bahrain
Email: [email protected]
Tel: +973-17-752-742
Fax: +973-17-754-835
Twitter: @omareconomics
© COPYRIGHT 2015. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
  • Home
  • About/CV
  • Research
  • Mainstream Media
  • Teaching