THE OMAR AL-UBAYDLI HOMEPAGE
  • Home
  • About/CV
  • Research
  • Mainstream Media
  • Teaching

Article: "The Success of Emirates, Qatar, and Etihad Airways Concerns Their Competitors" (جاح «الإماراتية» و «الاتحاد» و «القطرية» يقلق منافساتها)

11/16/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture
نُنشر في صحيفة الحياة
English version below

أثار نجاح كل من «الخطوط الجوية الإماراتية»، و«القطرية» و«الاتحاد»، قلق المنافسة العالمية، ما دفع بعض شركات الطيران الأخرى لرفع دعاوى ضد شركات الطيران الخليجية هذه، تتهمها بالاستفادة من دعم «غير عادل» من حكوماتها، مثلاً توفير قروض من دون فائدة. وأصبح استعداد المواطنين الخليجيين لتقبّل هذه التهم أمراً غريباً، حيث إنّهم يتصورون أنّ نجاحات الخطوط الجوية وهمية، قائمة على «منشطات مالية» لا تقدّم لمنافسيهاـ

المزيد
The recent success of Emirates, Etihad, and Qatar Airways has concerned global competitors, who have responded with government-mediated complaints alleging of “unfair” assistance from the Gulf governments, such as interest-free loans.
Gulf nationals are surprisingly willing to accept claims of “financial doping”, often believing that their carriers’ success is merely an artifact of an uneven playing field.

Unperturbed, the Gulf airlines produced vigorous defenses based on two pillars. First, denying the alleged governmental assistance. Second, alleging financial doping by the accusers. This strategy has thus far been successful, though the conflict may persist due to the financial stakes.

Success within industry circles does not necessarily equal success in the court of public opinion, however, and they have overlooked a particularly convincing defense: the fact that they actually deliver a good service, as reflected by hundreds of leading global awards. A consistent theme in the annals of international trade is that from the customer’s perspective, “corporate welfare” hurts quality, be it in airlines or any other product, for three main reasons.

First, governments are historically bad venture capitalists, and with good reason. Civil servants tend to make poor investment decisions because they have so little incentive to make good ones. An entrepreneur is confident that if he or she delivers a product valued by others, riches will follow, which acts as great motivation to gather precise information, study consumers’ needs, and work day-and-night. In contrast, a civil servant who picks the next big thing will get no more than a pat on the back. In fairness, there are success stories, such as South Korea and Singapore, where the government has played in important role in large-scale investments. However, history is littered with examples of state-led white elephants, such as Spain’s highly extravagant solar power industry, where Spanish citizens are still searching for the benefits that justify the billions of dollars of subsidies.

Second, the aforementioned well-meaning but demotivated civil servant is not necessarily paradigmatic; instead, many corporate welfare decisions are simply corrupt transfers from the public purse to the pockets of shrewd lobbyists, sometimes referred to as “crony capitalists.” Without subsidies, firms can only make money by providing a good service; once the government starts providing financial support, management focuses its effort on further lobbying, possibly in a corrupt form, rather than service quality. Farming subsidies usually fall into this category: the European Union’s Common Agricultural Policy throughout the 1990s was the poster child for decision-making verging on the kleptocratic.

Finally, in the event that politicians successfully introduce subsidies untainted by corruption at the inception stage, they sometimes inadvertently engender poor performance. This can be because they reduce the financial pressure on management, such as the case of soft budget constraints for public transport providers in many metropolitan areas; or it can be because they reward bad decisions, such as the banking bailouts in the wake of the 2008 global financial crisis.

If you open up the books of the companies that receive subsidies, you are more likely to find a toxic cocktail of incompetence and corruption than evidence of a direct positive effect on service quality. Consumers often face the double insult of deteriorating service quality combined with a higher tax bill to underwrite the subsidies. That is why economists urge governments to do nothing in response to “unfair” subsidies by the government of a trading partner, despite the fact that the World Trade Organization’s rules on subsidies and countervailing measures afford them the right to respond with their own financial doping.

Among scholars in the fields of international trade and government regulation, Delta Airlines’ claim that subsidies were helping competitors deliver a better service probably led to a lot of head-scratching. The irony was accentuated by the fact that the inferior service delivered by the accusers can itself be partially attributed to the subsidies that they actually receive! Regardless, Emirati and Qatari citizens should be proud of their carriers’ success.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Omar Al-Ubaydli

    This is where you can find all my articles, as well as some of my interviews and media mentions

    Archives

    June 2020
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    September 2015
    July 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    December 2014
    July 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    September 2013
    December 2011
    October 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011

    Categories

    All
    AGSIW
    Akhbar AlKhaleej
    Akransas Democrat Gazette
    Al Arabiya
    Al Hayat
    Al-Hayat
    AlHurra
    AlWatan
    Article
    Articles
    Axios
    Bahrain TV
    Bloomberg
    Capitol Hill Show
    Daily Caller
    Economic Development
    Economic Diversification
    Entrepreneurship
    Environment
    EU
    Experiment
    Financial Post
    Forbes
    Forbes Opinion
    Fox Business
    Game Theory
    GCC
    Government Policy
    Gulf Daily News
    IISS
    Ikhbariya
    InsideSources
    Investor's Business Daily
    Iran
    LSE Middle East Center Blog
    Marginal Revolution
    Marketplace
    MarketWatch
    MEPC
    Methodology
    Migration
    Newsweek ME
    Oil
    OPEC
    Philadelphia Inquirer
    Productivity
    Quartz
    Quotation
    Radio Interview
    R&D
    RegBlog
    Regulation
    RUSI Newsbrief
    Russia
    San Antonio Express
    Saudi Arabia
    Seminar
    Single Market
    Strade
    Subsidies
    The Hill
    The National
    Trade
    TRT World
    Tyler Morning Telegraph
    UAE
    Unemployment
    US News
    Video
    أخبار الخليج
    إذاعة البحرين
    الاتحاد الأوروبي
    الاتحاد الأوروبي
    الإنتاجية
    البحث العلمي
    البحرين
    البحرين
    التجارة
    التعليم
    التنمية الاقتصادية
    التنمية الاقتصادية
    التنويع الاقتصادي
    الحياة
    الحياة
    السعودية
    السوق المشتركة
    السياسة الحكومية
    السياسة الحكومية
    الصيرفة الإسلامية
    الضوابط
    الضوابط
    المعهد الدولي للدراسات الإستراتيجية
    النفط
    النفط
    الهجرة
    الهند
    الوسط
    الوطن
    إيران
    تلفزيون البحرين
    تلفزيون البحرين
    جمعية الريادة الشبابية
    روسيا
    مجلس التعاون
    مقابلة
    مقال
    مقال
    نظرية الألعاب
    نيوزويك الشرق الأوسط

    RSS Feed

Omar Al-Ubaydli
Bahrain Center for Strategic, International and Energy Studies
PO Box 496, Manama
Kingdom of Bahrain
Email: omar@omar.ec
Tel: +973-17-752-742
Fax: +973-17-754-835
Twitter: @omareconomics
© COPYRIGHT 2015. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
  • Home
  • About/CV
  • Research
  • Mainstream Media
  • Teaching